![]() ![]() ![]() … If there is fraud or abuse or waste or corruption in the federal government, it is the constitutional duty of Congress to find the facts and, as necessary, take corrective action.” “hen a committee of Congress seeks testimony and records by issuing a valid subpoena in the context of a duly authorized investigation, it has the Constitution’s blessing, and ultimately, it is acting not in its own interest, but for the benefit of the People of the United States. Without information, Congress would be shooting in the dark, unable to legislate “wisely or effectively.”Īlong the same lines, an earlier federal District Court opinion had this to say: Unless Congress have and use every means of acquainting itself with the acts and the disposition of the administrative agents of the government, the country must be helpless to learn how it is being served.” It is meant to be the eyes and the voice, and to embody the wisdom and will of its constituents. “It is the proper duty of a representative body to look diligently into every affair of government and to talk much about what it sees. The Supreme Court described the role of congressional oversight as follows: The power to investigate is key to Congress’ ability to inform the public, legislate wisely, and carry out other duties assigned to it by the Constitution. As part of that effort, the Committee solicited information on how Congress could improve its oversight function. The Levin Center at Wayne Law, created to honor the bipartisan oversight legacy of Senator Carl Levin, was invited to testify. Early this year, the House Modernization Committee held a hearing focused on restoring the capacity of Congress to meet the needs of the American people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |